Everyone hates OK! magazine
The whole world is pissed off at OK! magazine right now -- not for spending $500,000 on Michael Jackson's "last" pic (he was probably dead in the pic), but for tastelessly putting the pic on the cover of their "tribute" issue. From the New York Post:
[Flynet]
The whole world is pissed off at OK! magazine right now -- not for spending $500,000 on Michael Jackson's "last" pic (he was probably dead in the pic), but for tastelessly putting the pic on the cover of their "tribute" issue. From the New York Post:
OK! magazine spent more than $500,000 on the "last" picture of Michael Jackson on a stretcher and possibly dead -- but was it worth it? Our well-placed source says some staffers objected to owner Richard Desmond's decision to put the ghoulish picture on this week's cover -- and it looks like advertisers and readers may agree. The source told us, "Media buyers have canceled upcoming meetings to discuss rates. It's a disgrace. They've sunk to a new low." In addition, Sean Combs and Jay-Z are said to be so furious, "they're organizing a boycott," according to our source.The fact that OK! magazine put THIS picture on the cover of their publication is not only tasteless, but disgraceful. Considering how absolutely shocking and compelling it is, it's no wonder Diddy and Jay-Z are so upset about THIS picture. Anyone that would use THIS picture just to draw attention to their magazine/website is not only heartless, but exploiting a person's untimely death for their own financial gain -- and by THIS picture, I mean THIS one.
[Flynet]














haha I see what you did there...
What is the fuss about? That same picture was all over the news.
Which picture?
I love you, Michael !!!!!