Jennifer Lopez at the Golden Globes in Beverly Hills (1/11)
J.Lo was spotted again not wearing her wedding ring, this time at the Golden Globes on Sunday. But she has a perfectly valid excuse why she didn't have the ring on that doesn't have to do with divorce so quit talking about divorce nope definitely not getting a divorce. It clashed with her dress. Lopez told In Touch Weekly:
[WENN, BauerGriffinOnline]
J.Lo was spotted again not wearing her wedding ring, this time at the Golden Globes on Sunday. But she has a perfectly valid excuse why she didn't have the ring on that doesn't have to do with divorce so quit talking about divorce nope definitely not getting a divorce. It clashed with her dress. Lopez told In Touch Weekly:
"Every time I’m not wearing my ring, people think I’m getting divorced. That’s crazy! It just didn’t go with the dress. Divorce is not — and was never — an option."Hey J.Lo, guess what I'm looking at on my wall right now. Yup, a college degree. And I didn't buy it off the internet. If we forget the fact that I blog for a living, I think that validates that I'm not completely retarded. That's who your comment was aimed at, right? Retarded people? It didn't go with the dress? Have you ever heard a lamer excuse than that? She might has well have said her dog ate it.
The purse doesnt "go with the dress" and she dragged it along. I think this woman has a mental problem.
Back fat doesnt go with that dress either but she still wore that.
Her ring would have matched better than her creepy little husband. He is a fashion "don't".
Aaand what is so wrong about a degree bought off the internet?? Just asking anyway, not like I have fourteen of those neatly framed.
Very impressive, Ugliest Guy.
Why was she there anyway?